What is a primary reason for requiring code review before pushes in Team Development?

What is a primary reason for requiring code review before pushes in Team Development?

• A. To ensure Code Quality
• B. To Delay Release
• C. To Increase Costs
• D. To Decrease Collaboration

Answer: (A)

Code quality is the primary focus here. Requiring a code review before pushes means peers inspect the change to ensure it is correct, readable, and aligned with team standards. This early feedback helps catch logic errors, potential performance issues, and improper use of APIs before the code becomes part of the shared base, leading to fewer defects and easier maintenance down the line. It also spreads knowledge about the codebase across the team and fosters collaboration, since teammates review and discuss code together. While it might slow down the initial push a bit, the overall result is more reliable releases with fewer surprises. Delays, higher costs, or reduced collaboration don’t align with the goal of improving quality through peer review.

Code quality is the primary focus here. Requiring a code review before pushes means peers inspect the change to ensure it is correct, readable, and aligned with team standards. This early feedback helps catch logic errors, potential performance issues, and improper use of APIs before the code becomes part of the shared base, leading to fewer defects and easier maintenance down the line. It also spreads knowledge about the codebase across the team and fosters collaboration, since teammates review and discuss code together. While it might slow down the initial push a bit, the overall result is more reliable releases with fewer surprises. Delays, higher costs, or reduced collaboration don’t align with the goal of improving quality through peer review.